I get through the keywords:
- The name of the creator (in Arabic), alleging a keyword,
- The season in question (in Arabic), alleging a keyword,
- The type of collection (haute couture, ready-to-wear) in Arabic is the title of the sector,
- Still add the title (in English) of the article to add the creator's name in Latin characters.
Thus, the page devoted to the latest haute couture collection of Elie Saab: "???? ???, ???? - ???? 2009 ????? ????? - Elie Saab, very clear (is not it?), Though I am capable to write such a personal way in Arabic.
Details: in the private space, the keywords optimizacija sajta(names of creators and the seasons) and categories (couture, ready-to-wear ...)using tags, which allows me to to update the site with full particulars in Latin characters, while the titles displayed on the public site are in Arabic. Thus the keyword "Elie Saab" is titled:
Elie Saab[ar] ???? ???
The incentive
Once the display (not too far down the list of results) got into Google, an aspect of optimization is to present results in a way that "makes you want to click. They are then more elements of pure SEO, but simply "incentives". They are not necessarily used by Google to calculate the order of presentation of results, however they must clear to tempt users to click on the link.
Three elements of the page are displayed by Google, it should therefore take special care to ...
If you search "Elie Saab", one of the pages of my site and mode appears (in second place behind the official website of Elie Saab):
The title in blue, bold and underlined, is the title of the page. It has already been optimized for SEO. But we see here that is important in its output, in order to entice the user to click on the link: it is short, very explicit (and you might as well: corresponds exactly to the content page).
Having removed the name of the site title, besides a possible gain in terms of classification, can also display a highly condensed and called explicitly. Consider, for example the aforementioned article Bakchich:
The presence of the site name and its hook ("Bribe: information, surveys and evil spirit") visually pollute the title as displayed in Google results, and the title of the article (yet "optimized "As we have seen) is truncated.
Consider, for example an "info" (which we contrefout, M'enfin brief): "In the PS, Julien Dray denounced" amateurism "of Martine Aubry. This is an AFP report back on many news sites: the content is based entirely on the resumption of a ticket Blog from Julien Dray. As I write these lines, if I try "Julien Dray, Martine Aubry (content words that correspond quite precisely on the ticket Julien Dray), the original note appears on page six (at 62) from Google.
And for good reason.
Here is how the original ticket:
Page title: "The Blog from Julien Dray: A cry about." The article criticizes directly Martine Aubry, but it is not in its title. Title half of the title is "The Blog from Julien Dray" and the other half as a downright cryptic.
Front page of results, we find:
This gives several pages of results that point to the resumption of the AFP dispatch, which itself is a resumption of ticket Julien Dray. The source of the information, it is stashed in the sixth page of results.
Returning to the three elements displayed by Google. The second is a short description (two lines) of the article. If you provide a meta-tag description relevant is the content of this meta-tag that is displayed here. Otherwise, it extract the content of the page that contains the phrase you searched, cut "the hatchet" and therefore relatively little incentive.
It is here appropriate to indicate a meta-tag description incentive. Again, this element will certainly not be used by Google to rank search results, but the poster on the results page should encourage users to follow the link to your page. Again: short, incentive and accurately describing the content of your page.
Skeletons default SPIP do very well:
[ ]
INTRODUCTION # This tag is really handy. If you fill in the field "Description" section is directly the text is displayed. You have every interest in using this field and write a short text and relevant.
But if you leave this field empty, then take the early SPIP hat and text, to make this "introduction". This allows for the "introductions" in all cases (write a specific text for the field "Description" can be a chore) since then it is directly the beginning of the hat and the text that are used, but informing relevant way the "descriptive", you get a much more controlled.
Finally, the last item displayed by Google is the URL of the page. Again, the real interest of the URL for the classification of results is uncertain. But it is likely that the incentive effect for the user is not negligible.
If I see displayed in full, in Google, the URL of the page as:
I can be sure that this page is property of Elie Saab. If instead I see displayed:
is less immediately compelling ...
Conclusion
No conclusion. There may be other elements to be addressed. Feel free to address them in the forum below: if necessary I can complete this section.
- The name of the creator (in Arabic), alleging a keyword,
- The season in question (in Arabic), alleging a keyword,
- The type of collection (haute couture, ready-to-wear) in Arabic is the title of the sector,
- Still add the title (in English) of the article to add the creator's name in Latin characters.
Thus, the page devoted to the latest haute couture collection of Elie Saab: "???? ???, ???? - ???? 2009 ????? ????? - Elie Saab, very clear (is not it?), Though I am capable to write such a personal way in Arabic.
Details: in the private space, the keywords optimizacija sajta(names of creators and the seasons) and categories (couture, ready-to-wear ...)
Elie Saab
The incentive
Once the display (not too far down the list of results) got into Google, an aspect of optimization is to present results in a way that "makes you want to click. They are then more elements of pure SEO, but simply "incentives". They are not necessarily used by Google to calculate the order of presentation of results, however they must clear to tempt users to click on the link.
Three elements of the page are displayed by Google, it should therefore take special care to ...
If you search "Elie Saab", one of the pages of my site and mode appears (in second place behind the official website of Elie Saab):
The title in blue, bold and underlined, is the title of the page. It has already been optimized for SEO. But we see here that is important in its output, in order to entice the user to click on the link: it is short, very explicit (and you might as well: corresponds exactly to the content page).
Having removed the name of the site title, besides a possible gain in terms of classification, can also display a highly condensed and called explicitly. Consider, for example the aforementioned article Bakchich:
The presence of the site name and its hook ("Bribe: information, surveys and evil spirit") visually pollute the title as displayed in Google results, and the title of the article (yet "optimized "As we have seen) is truncated.
Consider, for example an "info" (which we contrefout, M'enfin brief): "In the PS, Julien Dray denounced" amateurism "of Martine Aubry. This is an AFP report back on many news sites: the content is based entirely on the resumption of a ticket Blog from Julien Dray. As I write these lines, if I try "Julien Dray, Martine Aubry (content words that correspond quite precisely on the ticket Julien Dray), the original note appears on page six (at 62) from Google.
And for good reason.
Here is how the original ticket:
Page title: "The Blog from Julien Dray: A cry about." The article criticizes directly Martine Aubry, but it is not in its title. Title half of the title is "The Blog from Julien Dray" and the other half as a downright cryptic.
Front page of results, we find:
This gives several pages of results that point to the resumption of the AFP dispatch, which itself is a resumption of ticket Julien Dray. The source of the information, it is stashed in the sixth page of results.
Returning to the three elements displayed by Google. The second is a short description (two lines) of the article. If you provide a meta-tag description relevant is the content of this meta-tag that is displayed here. Otherwise, it extract the content of the page that contains the phrase you searched, cut "the hatchet" and therefore relatively little incentive.
It is here appropriate to indicate a meta-tag description incentive. Again, this element will certainly not be used by Google to rank search results, but the poster on the results page should encourage users to follow the link to your page. Again: short, incentive and accurately describing the content of your page.
Skeletons default SPIP do very well:
[ ]
INTRODUCTION # This tag is really handy. If you fill in the field "Description" section is directly the text is displayed. You have every interest in using this field and write a short text and relevant.
But if you leave this field empty, then take the early SPIP hat and text, to make this "introduction". This allows for the "introductions" in all cases (write a specific text for the field "Description" can be a chore) since then it is directly the beginning of the hat and the text that are used, but informing relevant way the "descriptive", you get a much more controlled.
Finally, the last item displayed by Google is the URL of the page. Again, the real interest of the URL for the classification of results is uncertain. But it is likely that the incentive effect for the user is not negligible.
If I see displayed in full, in Google, the URL of the page as:
I can be sure that this page is property of Elie Saab. If instead I see displayed:
is less immediately compelling ...
Conclusion
No conclusion. There may be other elements to be addressed. Feel free to address them in the forum below: if necessary I can complete this section.
